Australian Natural Resources Atlas

Natural Resource Topics

Water resources - Quality - Queensland

Location map of QLD

Queensland

What are the main pressures on surface water quality and the key findings?

Pressures on Surface Water Quality

Main findings: Location of Water Quality problems and trends

Turbidity and nutrients were the dominant water quality issues within Queensland. Most North East Coast Drainage Division basins, particularly larger inland extending basins, recorded turbidity exceedances. Several smaller, relatively well vegetated, coastal basins including the Russell-Mulgrave, Johnstone and Pioneer did not have turbidity exceedances. The distribution of nutrient guideline exceedances particularly total phosphorus, paralleled turbidity. Basins without phosphorus exceedances included the Herbert, Tully and Burnett. Data for total nitrogen was less extensive but showed that some basins without exceedances for total phosphorus, did have total nitrogen exceedances i.e., the Herbert. Insufficient data were available to assess nutrient concentration trends.

Queensland does not suffer the major salinity problems experienced in other States. However, trend results identified some basins undergoing changes including the Burdekin and Condomine-Balonne both which recorded increasing salinity. Lower basin tidally influenced sampling sites were included in the exceedance analyses and were thought largely responsible for all basins that recorded salinity exceedances including the Daintree, O'Connell, Kolan, Burrum, Brisbane and Logan-Albert basins.

Exceedances in pH were recorded for a number of coastal Queensland basins. These included several relatively undisturbed basins i.e. the Endeavor and Daintree, and may reflect the natural acidity of lowland floodplain surface waters. Other basins recording exceedances included the Russell-Mulgrave, Tully, Herbert, Ross, O'Connell and Burrum, all of which have relatively intensive development and floodplain modification. Further investigation is warranted to ascertain whether exceedances at these sites were due to natural conditions or potential water quality impacts associated with the disturbance of acid sulfate soils.

With the exception of two sites in Oxley Creek in the Brisbane Basin, faecal coliforms are not routinely monitored in Queensland waterways.

Summaries presented within State and Territory reporting sections are from project reports compiled by State and Territory agencies. For further information contact the Queensland Department of Natural Resources (QDNR) or the Queensland Environment Protection Agency (EPA)

Description of water quality monitoring programs

Organisations Involved

Management Objectives

Sampling Methods

Routine (regular time period) monitoring (see detailed methodology report).

Summaries presented within State and Territory reporting sections are excepts from project reports compiled by State and Territory agencies. For further information contact the Queensland Department of Natural Resources or the Queensland Environment Protection Agency (EPA)

Map of number of measurement stations per drainage basin for QLD

The following table lists the coverage of water quality monitoring in Queensland. Basins that had no stations used in this assessment of water quality monitoring are not listed in this table.

Drainage BasinNumber of stations used in water quality reportingNumber of attributes for which exceedance analyses could be determinedNumber of attributes for which trend analyses could be determined
QLD245N/AN/A
Baffle Creek354
Barron River850
Black River254
Border Rivers755
Boyne River203
Brisbane River2054
Burdekin River1054
Burnett River1154
Burrum River350
Calliope River104
Condamine-Culgoa Rivers1555
Coopers Creek100
Daintree River250
Don River204
Endeavour River250
Fitzroy River (Qld)2654
Gilbert River103
Haughton River354
Herbert River1354
Hinchinbrook Island140
Kolan River250
Logan-Albert River3054
Maroochy River754
Mary River (Qld)1754
Mitchell River (Qld)404
Mossman River450
Mulgrave-Russell River850
Noosa River103
OConnell River954
Pine River650
Pioneer River554
Plane Creek253
Proserpine River553
Ross River451
South Coast1153
Tully River250
Water Park Creek154

Click on the basin name in the table to view a water quality report for that basin.

What is the extent of the water quality monitoring coverage?

Reported Monitoring Coverage

262 sites, (163 DNR & 99 EPA) were reported covering 34 basins. The compiled monitoring coverage was good for the more developed part of the State but was primarily restricted to the North-East Coast Drainage Division. Data for three basins of the northern Murray Darling Drainage Division and two basins within the Gulf of Carpentaria division were also reported. No data were reported for the Bulloo-Bancannia and Lake Eyre Drainage Divisions, the majority of Gulf of Carpentaria Drainage Division and for two Murray-Darling Drainage Division basins (Moonie and Warrego).

Monitoring station density and resultant basin coverage was too low to characterise water quality within a number of smaller coastal basins.

Most of State exceedance analysis coverage was for five water quality variables: salinity, turbidity total nitrogen, total phosphorus and pH. Trend analyses were only conducted for turbidity and salinity due to limitations with the period of record and frequency of collection for nutrient and pH data.

Other State water quality data was also excluded from the analysis for the same reasons.

Application of findings, information gaps and recommendations

Application of findings

The assessment of surface water quality in Queensland has provided a valuable insight on the current condition of many Queensland basins and has assisted with the identification of river systems that are improving or degrading over time.

Results in combination with other studies suggest the following areas warrant further attention for Water Quality Management in Qld waterways:

Information Gaps

Recommendations

  1. Develop specific water quality guidelines as per ANZECC (in prep) on a catchment or regional basis to allow for the setting of realistic water quality objectives.
  2. Water quality monitoring programs in the Murray-Darling, Gulf of Carpentaria, and Bulloo-Bancannia Drainage Divisions be developed further in order to identify existing and potential water quality issues in these drainage divisions.
  3. Water quality monitoring be considered in relatively undeveloped regions such as Cape York where current near pristine conditions present the opportunity to collect good baseline data.
  4. Consider a revised monitoring program for nutrient and faecal coliform levels to more adequately understand the condition of waterways in Queensland in relation to nutrient trends and for recreational use.

Summaries presented within State and Territory reporting sections are excepts from project reports compiled by State and Territory agencies. For further information contact the Queensland Department of Natural Resources (QDNR) or the Queensland Environment Protection Agency (EPA)

Further Information

Key

   Links to an another web site
   Opens a pop-up window