Australian Natural Resources Atlas

Natural Resource Topics

Water resources - Management and Development - Queensland

Location map of Proserpine River

Groundwater Management Unit: Proserpine River

Introduction

Management Context:

The demand for groundwater supplies in the Don River GMU has resulted in the groundwater resource exceeding its optimal level of development. Allocation levels are greater than the sustainable yield of the resource. Further increases in development could lead to system unreliability and possible failures in the near future.

Groundwater pollution is one of the priority issues for the GMU. The Don River GMU is a major fruit and vegetable producer. Pesticides and other sprays that are used in the growing of such crops may enter the aquifer from the surface. This could affect the quality of groundwater in the GMU.

Saltwater intrusion is another priority issue that requires constant management and monitoring. The Don River GMU has established a monitoring network designed to assess the direction of movement of the saltwater/freshwater interface.

There is a high demand for groundwater supplies of the GMU with no development potential in accordance with the sustainable yield estimate. To meet the increasing demand for groundwater, the sustainable yield of the resource will need to be enhanced through increasing aquifer recharge. Drainage and use patterns are fully established, therefore any increase to recharge would have to be through increasing the rate of artificial recharge.

The Proserpine River GMU is a significant consumer of surface water supplied from the Peter Faust Dam, located just outside the western boundary of the GMU along the Proserpine River. The majority of this water is used for irrigation within the Kelsey Creek Water Board Area. This area of intense irrigation is located in the south-western section of the GMU.

Rising groundwater levels are of concern throughout the GMU. Since the Peter Faust Dam was constructed in 1991, groundwater abstraction has decreased due to increased surface water use. There are concerns regarding the future effects that may be induced by increased recharge, due to the infiltration of irrigation supplies, greatly exceeding the level of abstraction. Effects of this are already being exhibited in the Kelsey Creek Water Board Area.

Groundwater levels within the Kelsey Creek Water Board Area have risen to within 4m of the surface since readings began in 1974. If the water table were to rise sufficiently, waterlogging of the root zone could occur. In 1996, a groundwater investigation attempted to model future groundwater level rises.

Monitoring of the resource is a management priority. Groundwater level measurements are taken twice a year from 112 bores as part of a monitoring bore network. Bores within this network have been sampled for water quality analysis as recently as 1995. A priority issue for the GMU is monitoring of salinity levels along the coast to prevent saltwater intrusion. Although there is no formal saltwater intrusion network, both private and monitoring bores are sampled for water quality trends.

The sustainable yield of the resource was estimated in 1981 and is the basis for all allocations. Reassessment of this estimate is a minor management priority and is considered to be an area of investigation in the near future.

Allocations slightly exceed the sustainable yield. The general water use trend is towards surface water supplies and abstraction is estimated to be approximately 50 % of the total allocation, consequently it is only a minor priority to refine the allocations to sustainable levels.

The formation of a community based Advisory Committee would increase the input into the development of management strategies. It would enhance community awareness regarding the

 

Priority issues

Declining Water Levels

 NO

Salt Water Intrusion

 YES

SALINISATION

 

Dryland

 NO

Irrigation

 NO

Groundwater

 NO

Surface Water

 NO

Urban

 NO

Point Source Pollution

 NO

Diffuse Source Pollution

 NO

Subsidence

 NO

Artificial Recharge (ML/yr)

 no data

Ecosystems Protection

 NO

Surface Water Interaction

 NO

Management Plans

 YES

Defined Minimum Water Level

 NO

Comment: Management of the GMU is concerned with monitoring rising groundwater levels and monitoring of salinity levels as a preventative measure against saltwater intrusion.

Comments on Management Responses

See QLD Water Resources Assessment 2000 Technical Report for a review of management responses.

Assessment of monitoring in Proserpine River

See QLD Water Resources Assessment 2000 Technical Report for a review of monitoring.

What is the estimated demand for groundwater?

Sustainable Yield

Comment about sustainable yield figure: 

In 1981, a groundwater investigation into the groundwater resources of the Proserpine area was conducted. The investigation included an assessment of the sustainable yield of the aquifers.

The assessment employed a moisture behaviour model; a groundwater storage behaviour model; a groundwater recharge model and a land use model. The results of the models were integrated to produce sustainable yield estimates at a 10% risk of failure.

The sustainable yield of the alluvial deposits associated with the tributaries is calculated to be 1200 Ml/yr. The sustainable yield of the Tertiary Sediments is calculated to be 18400 Ml/yr giving a combined sustainable yield for the aquifers of the Proserpine River GMU of 19600 Ml/yr.

Sustainable yield:

ML/yr

Threshold year for sustainable year:

1,993 

Abstraction Volume 1996/1997:

10,000 ML 

Current Resource development categorisation:

 

Estimated Use in 2020

Comment:

 

Estimated use in 2020:

10,000 ML 

% change from 1996/1997:

Resource development categorisation:

 

Estimated in 2050

Comment:

 

Estimated use in 2050:

10,000 ML 

% change from 1996/1997:

Resource development categorisation:

 

What assumptions were used in this assessment

No further information about assumptions used in this assessment was provided by QLD.

Data Availability,Gaps and Recommendations

Data Availablility:

The Proserpine River GMU has 112 monitoring bores within the GMU.

Groundwater levels have been taken since the mid 1970s and are measured an average of twice a year. Groundwater quality samples have been taken from private and monitoring bores and provide a basic trend of salinity across the GMU. Sampling is has occurred as recently as 1995.

Data is also available through reports. Several modelling projects have been conducted. These projects mainly examined the possible effects of sand dams on aquifer recharge. Assessing the sustainable yield and determining various aquifer properties were incorporated into the studies. The results from the projects are used as inputs into providing the sustainable management of the resource.

Current Gaps and Recommendations:

Data Gaps: There is a good coverage of bores within the monitoring network of the Proserpine River GMU that enables groundwater level and groundwater quality trends to be observed. Gaps do exist particularly with regards the documentation of management issues and abstraction data.

Recommendations: The main recommendation for the Proserpine River GMU is to reassess the sustainable yield. The sustainable yield was estimated in 1981 and is the basis for all allocations. Reassessment of this estimate would improve sustainable resource management and would be the basis for developing appropriate allocation rates throughout the GMU.

Further information

Key

   Links to an another web site
   Opens a pop-up window