Biodiversity and Vegetation - Naracoorte Coastal Plain
Naracoorte Coastal Plain

Proportion of native vegetation remaining in this IBRA region
| Major Vegetation Group | Pre-European Area (ha) | Circa 1997 Area (ha) | % remaining relative to pre-European area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eucalyptus tall open forests | 12 | 12 | 100 |
| Eucalyptus open forest | 276,020 | 46,652 | 16.9 |
| Eucalyptus low open forest | 1,308 | 1,308 | 100 |
| Eucalyptus woodlands | 668,476 | 146,048 | 21.8 |
| Acacia forest and woodlands | 36 | 36 | 100 |
| Casuarina forest and woodlands | 328 | 328 | 100 |
| Melaleuca forest and woodlands | 13,872 | 4,552 | 32.8 |
| Other forests and woodlands | 1,816 | 104 | 5.7 |
| Eucalyptus open woodlands | 54,516 | 5,092 | 9.3 |
| Mallee woodlands and shrublands | 682,772 | 161,060 | 23.6 |
| Low closed forest and closed shrublands | 27,384 | 16,644 | 60.8 |
| Acacia shrublands | 255,992 | 12,724 | 5 |
| Other Shrublands | 128,956 | 76,764 | 59.5 |
| Heath | 45,832 | 45,388 | 99 |
| Tussock grasslands | 250,148 | 7,760 | 3.1 |
| Other grasslands, herblands, sedgelands and rushlands | 33,620 | 26,068 | 77.5 |
| Chenopod shrub, samphire shrub and forblands | 60,656 | 19,496 | 32.1 |
| Mangroves, tidal mudflat, samphire and bare areas, claypan, sand, rock, salt lakes, lagoons, lakes | 32,180 | 23,488 | 73 |
Methods
This analysis is based on a comparison of the present extent of major vegetation groups (circa 1997) and pre-European mapping.
Applications
Analysis at the Australia-wide, State and Territory and regional scales provides information on which to base broad assessments of change in extent and type of vegetation. This is a key input to assessing:
- the representativeness or otherwise of Australia's nature conservation estate and for related interpretations (e.g. setting priorities for retention of native vegetation types);
- opportunities for catchment rehabilitation, whether the issue is catchment hydrology or dryland salinity control;
- the types of vegetation suitable for rehabilitation, restoration and/or revegetation activities in an area; and
- priorities for protection of biodiversity in landscapes under stress.
Limitations
Pre-European vegetation and present native vegetation for many States and Territories do not match in mapping method or scale. Development of pre-European vegetation maps in cleared areas of Australia is usually dependent upon coarse or generalised data on landforms and soils sometimes at 1:250 000 or even 1:1 000 000 scale. Reconstructing the natural complexity of vegetation patterns from such broad interpretations is difficult. Earlier vegetation mapping for areas now cleared may similarly be coarse in scale and/or generalised, with little data from systematic field sampling to support the derivation of mapping units and the allocation of individual patches of native vegetation to mapping units.
Pre-European data is more reliable where:
- impacts of European land use is minimal;
- there is good physical and floristic information (e.g. in Victoria) which can be used for detailed interpolation; and
- the scale of the pre-European mapping and method is similar to that of the current extent mapping (e.g. in Queensland, Victoria, Northern Territory and Western Australia).
Data variability is greatest in New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory and South Australia, where the pre-European data does not meet the requirements of the National Vegetation Information System. In Tasmania the pre-European data is not finalised. In these States it is assumed that the present vegetation mapped is an approximate representation of the pre-European vegetation. The Australia wide pre-European major vegetation groups data set is an interim product.
What major vegetation groups have been cleared in since European settlement?
| Major Vegetation Group | Cleared Area (ha) |
|---|---|
| Eucalyptus open forest | 229,368 |
| Eucalyptus woodlands | 522,428 |
| Melaleuca forest and woodlands | 9,320 |
| Other forests and woodlands | 1,712 |
| Eucalyptus open woodlands | 49,424 |
| Mallee woodlands and shrublands | 521,712 |
| Low closed forest and closed shrublands | 10,740 |
| Acacia shrublands | 243,268 |
| Other Shrublands | 52,192 |
| Heath | 444 |
| Tussock grasslands | 242,388 |
| Other grasslands, herblands, sedgelands and rushlands | 7,552 |
| Chenopod shrub, samphire shrub and forblands | 41,160 |
| Mangroves, tidal mudflat, samphire and bare areas, claypan, sand, rock, salt lakes, lagoons, lakes | 8,692 |
Note: The clearing referred to in table 2 does not include grazing, thinning or other activities. In particular, parts of the rangelands may be heavily disturbed.
Methods
This analysis is based on the present extent of native vegetation and data on the type and area of these groups cleared in Australia from the pre-European mapping. All summary findings are based on the data sets compiled for the National Vegetation Information System and development of the major vegetation groups.
Applications
This analysis at the Australia-wide, State and Territory and regional scales provides information on which to base assessment of change in land cover and type of vegetation, a key input to vegetation management activities. Loss of particular vegetation types across regions impacts on biodiversity values and landscape function and this analysis highlights those major vegetation groups.
At the regional scale, the National Vegetation Information System compilation provides an excellent basis for regional planning groups to understand the changes in vegetation extent that have occurred and set their regional priorities for vegetation management in the context of this information. The assessment of major vegetation groups across Australia provides a broader context.
Limitations
As detailed previously, issues of attributes, scale and currency of available mapping limits the precision of this analysis. The broad nature of the major vegetation groups masks the distinct vegetation types and regional clearing patterns that would emerge at a finer scale of analysis.
What sources of information were used?
View the guidelines for the interpretation of vegetation mapping products.
References
View the references used in the Australian Native Vegetation Assessment 2001.
Partnerships
Australian Native Vegetation Assessment 2001 was facilitated and coordinated by the National Land and Water Resources Audit and prepared in partnership with State, Territory and Commonwealth agencies:
Australian Capital Territory
Department of Urban Services
www.urbanservices.act.gov.au
New South Wales
www.dlwc.nsw.gov.au
NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service
www.npws.nsw.gov.au
NSW Botanic Gardens
www.rbgsyd.gov.au
Northern Territory
Department of Natural Resources, Environment and The Arts
www.nreta.nt.gov.au
Queensland
Environment Protection Agency
www.epa.qld.gov.au
South Australia
Planning SA
www.planning.sa.gov.au
Tasmania
Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment
www.dpiwe.tas.gov.au
Victoria
Department of Sustainability and Environment
www.dse.vic.gov.au
Western Australia
Agriculture WA
www.agric.wa.gov.au
Commonwealth
Australian Greenhouse Office
www.greenhouse.gov.au
Department of Environment and Heritage
www.deh.gov.au
Further information
View the Australian Native Vegetation Assessment 2001 report.
The National Vegetation Information System Framework framework.
View Landscape Health in Australia 2001 report.
View the Australian Catchment, River and Estuary Assessment 2002.
View the Australian Terrestrial Biodiversity Assessment 2002.
View all Theme Reports from the National Land and Water Resources Audit.
Link to Atlas on-line mapping for maps of major vegetation groups and other natural resource data.
Link to data available for down load.
Before you download
Most publications are downloadable as PDF files. Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view PDF files.
If you are unable to access a publication, please contact us to organise a suitable alternative format.
Key
Links to an another web site
Opens a pop-up window
