"Most available information on threatening processes, ecological requirements and conservation significance is anecdotal and not available on subregional basis but is inferred from broader scale assessments (ie across the CRA region). Very little de

Eucalyptus experts currently unavailable to comment on condition, trend and threatening process for subregions with endemic and species rich eucalypts

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of threatened plant species has been scarce. Data on population parameters fo

As noted in the text for NRM actions the datalayer for community Bush/Land/Coastcare, only contains data for those groups who wish to release their details (about half of the total).

As noted in the text for NRM actions the datalayer for wildlife refuges is currently being reviewed and the data used is not yet complete.

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of cryptic species has been scarce.

"Sampling bias towards public land. Very limited private land survey sites. Finescale vegetation mapping is not available for private land, although broader scale mapping has been conducted but not yet incorporated into an ecosystem classification

"Most available information on threatening processes, ecological requirements and conservation significance is anecdotal and not available on subregional basis but is inferred from broader scale assessments (ie across the CRA region). Very little de

Eucalyptus experts currently unavailable to comment on condition, trend and threatening process for subregions with endemic and species rich eucalypts

Lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of threatened plant species has been scarce. Data on population parameters for threatened species is sparse.

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of threatened plant species has been scarce. Data on population parameters fo

As noted in the text for NRM actions the datalayer for community Bush/Land/Coastcare, only contains data for those groups who wish to release their details (about half of the total).

As noted in the text for NRM actions the datalayer for wildlife refuges is currently being reviewed and the data used is not yet complete.

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of cryptic species has been scarce.

Targeted survey of cryptic species has been scarce.

"Gap in the coverage of CRA vegetation mapping in this subregion. Sampling bias towards public land. Very limited private land survey sites. Finescale vegetation mapping is not available for private land, although broader scale mapping has been co

"Limited validation and testing of the existing vegetation layer. Existing classification and modelling is constrained to forest ecosystems only and there has been no finescale systematic assessment, classification and mapping of non-forest ecosyste

"Sampling bias towards public land. Very limited private land survey sites. Finescale vegetation mapping is not available for private land, although broader scale mapping has been conducted but not yet incorporated into an ecosystem classification

"Most available information on threatening processes, ecological requirements and conservation significance is anecdotal and not available on subregional basis but is inferred from broader scale assessments (ie across the CRA region). Very little de

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of threatened plant species has been scarce. Data on population parameters fo

As noted in the text for NRM actions the datalayer for community Bush/Land/Coastcare, only contains data for those groups who wish to release their details (about half of the total).

As noted in the text for NRM actions the datalayer for wildlife refuges is currently being reviewed and the data used is not yet complete.

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of cryptic species has been scarce.

"Sampling bias towards public land. Very limited private land survey sites. Finescale vegetation mapping is not available for private land, although broader scale mapping has been conducted but not yet incorporated into an ecosystem classification

"Most available information on threatening processes, ecological requirements and conservation significance is anecdotal and not available on subregional basis but is inferred from broader scale assessments (ie across the CRA region). Very little de

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of threatened plant species has been scarce. Data on population parameters fo

Targeted survey of threatened plant species has been scarce. Data on population parameters for threatened species is sparse.

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of cryptic species has been scarce.

Targeted survey of cryptic species has been scarce.

"Limited validation and testing of the existing vegetation layer. Existing classification and modelling is constrained to forest ecosystems only and there has been no finescale systematic assessment, classification and mapping of non-forest ecosyste

"Sampling bias towards public land. Very limited private land survey sites. Finescale vegetation mapping is not available for private land, although broader scale mapping has been conducted but not yet incorporated into an ecosystem classification

"Most available information on threatening processes, ecological requirements and conservation significance is anecdotal and not available on subregional basis but is inferred from broader scale assessments (ie across the CRA region). Very little de

Eucalyptus experts currently unavailable to comment on condition, trend and threatening process for subregions with endemic and species rich eucalypts

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of threatened plant species has been scarce. Data on population parameters fo

As noted in the text for NRM actions the datalayer for community Bush/Land/Coastcare, only contains data for those groups who wish to release their details (about half of the total).

As noted in the text for NRM actions the datalayer for wildlife refuges is currently being reviewed and the data used is not yet complete.

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of cryptic species has been scarce.

"Sampling bias towards public land. Very limited private land survey sites. Finescale vegetation mapping is not available for private land, although broader scale mapping has been conducted but not yet incorporated into an ecosystem classification

Monitoring undertaken by Landcare and other community groups should be collated in a single system e.g.Distributed Database

Little up to date information on Riparian or Wetland condition and trend

"Most available information on threatening processes, ecological requirements and conservation significance is anecdotal and not available on subregional basis but is inferred from broader scale assessments (ie across the CRA region). Very little de

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of threatened plant species has been scarce. Data on population parameters fo

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of cryptic species has been scarce.

"Sampling bias towards public land. Very limited private land survey sites. Finescale vegetation mapping is not available for private land, although broader scale mapping has been conducted but not yet incorporated into an ecosystem classification

"Most available information on threatening processes, ecological requirements and conservation significance is anecdotal and not available on subregional basis but is inferred from broader scale assessments (ie across the CRA region). Very little de

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of threatened plant species has been scarce. Data on population parameters fo

As noted in the text for NRM actions the datalayer for community Bush/Land/Coastcare, only contains data for those groups who wish to release their details (about half of the total).

As noted in the text for NRM actions the datalayer for wildlife refuges is currently being reviewed and the data used is not yet complete.

Sampling bias towards public land and forest ecosystems. Very limited private land survey sites and lower intensity of sampling in non-forest ecosystems. Targeted survey of cryptic species has been scarce.

"Sampling bias towards public land. Very limited private land survey sites. Finescale vegetation mapping is not available for private land, although broader scale mapping has been conducted but not yet incorporated into an ecosystem classification