Australian Natural Resources Atlas

Natural Resource Topics

Australian Catchment, River and Estuary Assessment 2002

National Land and Water Resources Audit, 2002
ISBN 0 642 37125 3

Assessing Australia's Estuaries and Coastal Waterways

Understanding how natural processes and human modification affect the health of estuaries is important in the formulation of effective and affordable management strategies. The estuary assessment classified estuaries by both process type and condition. The information collated by the Audit is available to all estuary managers to assist in the development of management solutions and to monitor changes in existing estuarine condition.

Process classification

Australia's estuaries and coastal waterways were classified into six subclasses according to relative influence of the wave, tide and river energies that shape them. The overall geomorphology of an estuary is closely linked to these three main energy processes.

A seventh subclass 'other' accounts for the remaining 13% and includes drowned river valleys, embayments, and very small coastal lakes, lagoons and creeks.

The predominance of strand plains and tidal creeks (40% of the 972 estuaries classified) is a result of very low river discharges and reflects the fact that Australia is an arid continent with low relief.

Figure 46 presents the results of a plot of the relative importance of river, wave and tide energy on estuarine function. Figure 47 shows the distribution of Australia's estuaries by process type.

Validation of the classification was undertaken by mapping the geomorphology and sedimentary environments for 405 of Australia's modified estuaries (Figure 48). This work was completed by Geoscience Australia in cooperation with the States and the Northern Territory (see Heap et al. 2001). The mapping of sedimentary environments will also be useful to measure the extent of change in subsequent assessments.

Figure 46: Estuary types (as determined by sedimentary environment mapping) in the river - wave - tide energy triangle.
Figure 47: Distribution of Australia's estuaries by process type.

Dominant sedimentary environments indicate different types of estuaries and coastal waterways

Geoscience Australia developed conceptual models for four of the six coastal system subclasses based on idealised wave- and tide-dominated models in Dalrymple et al. (1992) (see Figures 49-52).

The four models illustrate the sedimentary environments for the main estuary types:

Figure 48: Sedimentary environments in Moreton Bay, Queensland

Figure 48: Sedimentary environments in Moreton Bay, Queensland
Figure 49: Wave-dominated estuary model. Examples include Lake Illawarra (New South Wales) and Swan River (Western Australia).

Notes:

  1. Wave-dominated estuaries are distinguished by relatively high wave energy at the mouth compared to tide energy.
  2. Near the mouth, total energy is high due to the summation of high wave and tide energies.
  3. Near the head, total energy is high due to high river energy. River energy declines downstream due to a reduction in downstream hydraulic gradient.
  4. In the middle of the estuary, total energy is low because waves can not penetrate the estuary, and because tidal energy is dissipated on the ebb- and flood-tide deltas.
  5. Waves transport sediment from the sea towards the estuary and build a barrier at the mouth. Tidal currents transport sediment into the estuary to form flood and ebb tidal deltas that extend seaward and landward of the inlet.
  6. Landward of the barrier and flood/ebb tide deltas is a low-energy relatively deep central basin. The central basin is the main sink for fine sediment.
  7. Waves and tidal currents deposit fine sediment on the edge of the central basin to form intertidal flats, and saltflats/saltmarshes. Mangroves are common along margins. Sandy beaches can also form.
  8. Sediment from the catchment is deposited in the main channel, on the floodplain, and can be transported into the estuary to form a fluvial bay-head delta that extends into the central basin.
Figure 50. Tide-dominated estuary model. Tide-dominated estuaries are distinguished by relatively high tidal energy at the mouth compared with wave energy. Examples include the Ord River (Western Australia) and Broad Sound Queensland).

Notes:

  1. Near the mouth, total energy is high because both tidal energy is high and wave energy is moderate.
  2. Inside the estuary, wave energy is reduced over extensive tidal sand banks, thus decreasing total energy.
  3. Total energy rises to a maximum where the difference between the effects of construction by the funnel-shaped entrance (tidal-amplification) and effects of dissipation by sediment shoals is greatest.
  4. Further headward, total energy falls to a minimum because friction created by the sediment shoals becomes greater than tidal amplification.
  5. total energy rises in the river-dominated zone because of constriction at the head.
  6. In the funnel-shaped mouth, strong tidal currents transport coarse sediment into the estuary and build elongate tidal sand banks that extend to the zone of maximum total energy.
  7. Near the tidal limit, where the channel is characterised by a sinuous river channel pattern, total energy is at a minimum. Sediment of mixed river and marine origin accumulates here.
  8. Intertidal flats, mangroves, and saltflat/saltmarshes occur extensively along the sides of the estuarine channel (woodroffe et al. 1989).
  9. Tide dominated estuaries are naturally turbid because of the strong tidal currents.
Figure 51: Wave-dominated delta model. Examples include the Manning River (New South Wales) and Yarra River (Victoria).

Notes:

  1. Wave-dominated deltas are characterised by relative high wave energy at the mouth compared to tide energy, and are distinguished from wave-dominated estuaries by high river energy.
  2. Total energy at the mouth is high because of high wave energy at the coast.
  3. Total energy declines immediately landward of the mouth because wave energy is dissipated on the barrier. The dominance of river energy further landward means total energy is relatively high along the channel.
  4. Maximum tidal energy occurs in the considered inlet mouth.
  5. At the mouth, waves transport sediment towards the entrance and build a sub aerial barrier.
  6. Sediment transported from the catchment by the river is deposited on the floodplain, forming levees and back swamps, and in the main channel.
  7. River sediment is transported directly to the mouth because the channel connects the rivers catchment with the ocean.
  8. Relatively strong river energy causes net seaward-directed sediment transport. Coarse sediment deposited near the inlet forms flood/ebb tide deltas.
Figure 52. Tide-dominated delta model. Examples include the Macarthur River (Northern Territory) and Burdekin River (Queensland).

Notes:

  1. Tide-dominated deltas are characterised by relatively high tide energy at the mouth compared with wave energy, and are distinguished from tide-dominated estuaries by high river energy.
  2. Tidal energy is greatest slightly landward of the mouth due to construction by the funnel shaped mouth.
  3. Wave energy is dissipated on shoals seaward of the mouth, and declines rapidly lamdwards.
  4. River energy remains moderate to high along the channel, but drops off significantly as the channel widens towards the mouth.
  5. Inside the mouth, moderately-strong tidal currents transport coarse sediment into the channel from offshore and build elongate tidal sand banks. These banks only extend a short distance into the channel because tidal energy is dissipated by channel friction.
  6. Extensive areas of intertidal flats, mangroves, and saltflat/ saltmarshes occur along the sides of the channel.

Building on our understanding of the impacts of land use activities, processes and estuary types, conceptual models can be developed to build an understanding of estuary ecology. This requires a three-dimensional approach, building an understanding of flows and fluxes between terrestrial and inter-tidal components, estuary surface, water column and estuary beds.

Three-dimensional conceptual models illustrating sediment transport processes and nitrogen cycling through the sedimentary environment suites of a wave-dominated estuary, a wave-dominated delta, a tide-dominated estuary, and a tide-dominated delta have been developed (Figures 53, 54). Other conceptual models are available through the Atlas.

Figure 53: Sediment processes in a tide-dominated estuary.

Notes:

  1. Fine and coarse sediment enter the estuary from the catchment, depending on river flow and sediment supply.
  2. The majority of coarse material is deposited at the head of the estuary, due to a reduction of river flow velocity and therefore sediment transport capacity. Some reworking and redeposition of material by tidal currents also occurs.
  3. Fine sediment undergoes both deposition and erosion in intertidal flats, aided by biological activity such as burrowing. Coarser material is also deposited on flanking environments by tidal currents and flood events. A general trend of slow growth of intertidal sedimentary environments is observed.
  4. Large quantities of suspended sediment are characteristic of tide-dominated estuaries, and a dynamic relationship exists between deposition, flocculation, resuspension and transport of sediment. Quantities of fine and coarse sediment can pool temporarily within the channel.
  5. Mangrove sedimentary environments, with interspersed tidal drainage channels, commonly flank tide-dominated estuaries, and serve as a depocentre for fine and flocculated sediment. Tidal asymmetry (high energy flood and lower energy ebb), baffling by vegetation, and percolation of tidal water through animal burrows result in the deposition of fine sediment, and allow for the replacement of intertidal flats by mangrove.
  6. Saltflat sedimentary environment experience inundation by king tides, and some deposition of fine sediment can occur. Ebb tide waters often flow through tidal drainage channels. Quantities of fine and coarse sediment can also be derived from the catchment and deposited during storm events.
  7. Accumulation of coarse bedload material can occur within the mouth of the estuary, forming tidal sand banks. This material tends to be unstable and is redistributed in large quantities during storms. Seagrasses are able to colonise and fix the sediment to an extent, also mangrove colonisation can occur on larger sand banks.
  8. Very little sediment is exported from the estuary overall, due to net landward transport driven by tidal action. The majority of sediment export occurs during flood events.
Figure 54: Nutrient processes in a tide-dominated estuary.

Notes:

  1. Nitrogen (particulate and dissolved;TN) enters the estuaries system from point- and non-point sources from within the catchment.
  2. Tidal movements on the flanks of the estuary transport particulate nitorgen (PN) and dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) onto the intertidal flats, where some of the dissolved inorganic notrogen is converted to particulate nitrogen through the activity of benthic micro algae.
  3. Mangrove sediment is a net sink for dissoloved inorganic nitrogen and particulate nitrogen. Nutrient uptake is driven by high rates of plant growth and microbial activity . N-fixation is active in the root-zone and contributes to the dissolved inorganic nitrogen pool. Some nitrogen is liberated to the atmosphere as N2 gas through denitrification. Particulate nitrogen is processed by biota such as crabs, or it is exported to the copastal waters as leaf litter and fine particulate matter. In the coastal waters it may be redistributed during ebb tides.
  4. Small amounts of particulate nitrogen are buriewd in salt flats during king tides. Most particulate nitrogen is exported back into the estuarine channel during the ebb tide.
  5. Particulate nitrogen and dissolved inorganic nitrogen exist within the water column. However due to turbidity, phytoplanktonproductivity is limited. Circulation and resuspension of particulate nitrogen occurs in this zone. Particulate nitrogen is probably reworked during the resuspension process, and dissolved inorganic nitrogen can be remineralised to the water column.
  6. A proprtion of the dissolved inorganic nitrogen reaches the less turbid zone at the mouth of the estuary where phytoplankton convert it to particulate nitrogen.
  7. Seagrasses, which colonise the tidal sand banks near the mouth of the estuary, also process dissolved inorganic nitrogen, in the same manner as that described for wave-dominated estuaries.
  8. Typically, only moderate quantities of the total nitrogen load are exported to the marine environment, however, this may be significant during flood events.

The dominant processes that drive estuary behaviour determine the susceptibility of estuaries to various pressures. Figure 55 describes the relative importance of estuary type to its susceptibility to impacts from changes in turbidity, circulation and sediment trapping.

Figure 55. Estuary types and their relative susceptibility to change. The estuary type diagrams illustrate key morphological features and diagnostic criteria for each type of system.

Condition assessment

Nadgee Lake and Inlet in New South Wales is in near-pristine condition.

Nadgee Lake and Inlet in New South Wales is in near-pristine condition.

Photo: Department of Land and Water Conservation, New South Wales.

Stage 1. Identifying Australia's near-pristine estuaries

A preliminary assessment of the condition of 979 estuaries was completed using qualitative information and expert opinion through State and Territory workshops and interviews using the assessment criteria outlined in Table 21. Additional information was sought to assist with more detailed assessment of all modified estuaries in Stage 2 of the condition assessment.

The photograph of Nadgee Lake and Inlet illustrates that despite the use of qualitative data, the identification of a 'near-pristine' estuary is relatively robust.

The near-pristine estuaries provide cost-effective opportunities to focus management activities on the protection of natural values. These estuaries provide reference sites to develop an improved understanding of natural estuary processes and are a key nature conservation and fishery resource.

The initial qualitative assessment was useful in:

Table 21: Criteria used in the initial assessment of estuary condition.
  Near-pristine condition Largely unmodified condition Modified condition Extensively modified condition
  Catchment natural cover
> 90%
Catchment natural cover
~ 65 - 90%
Catchment natural cover
< 65%
Catchment natural cover
< 35%
Land use
Limited roads & disturbance to natural conditions and processes No known gross impacts from land use e.g. sediments to waterways and estuary Documented impacts from land use (e.g. sediments and nutrients to waterways) Documented impacts from land use throughout waterways and into estuary
Catchment hydrology No dams or impoundments, virtually nil abstraction No dams or significant impoundments, some abstraction Dams and impoundments, significant abstraction modifying natural flows Dams and impoundments, significant abstraction modifying natural flows
Tidal regime No impediments to tidal flow, changes from natural morphology (e.g. training walls, barrages, bridges and causeways) No significant impediments to tidal flow or changes from natural morphology Impediments to tidal flow and/or changes from natural morphology (e.g. training walls, causeways, artificial opening of entrance) Major changes to tidal flow and/or major changes from natural morphology
Floodplain Wetlands intact in vegetation and hydrology, no alterations to flood pattern Wetlands mostly intact in vegetation and hydrology, no alterations to flood pattern Wetlands mostly cleared in vegetation an/or changes in hydrology (e.g. drains, tidal barrages, levees) Wetlands mostly cleared in vegetation an/or changes in hydrology (e.g. major losses in fresh to brackish wetlands)
Estuary use Extractive activities limited to Indigenous or limited and sustainable commercial and recreational fishing, no aquaculture Extractive activities limited to sustainable commercial and recreational fishing, minor aquaculture Extractive activities include dredging, extensive aquaculture, habitat modifying fishing methods (e.g. prawn trawling) Extractive activities include dredging, extensive aquaculture, habitat modifying fishing methods (e.g. prawn trawling)
Pests and weeds Minimal impact on estuary from catchment weeds and limited pests and weeds within estuary Minimal impact on estuary from catchment weeds and limited pests and weeds within estuary Significant impact on estuary from catchment weeds and impact on estuary ecology from pests and weeds within estuary Significant impact on estuary from catchment weeds and impact on estuary ecology from pests and weeds within estuary
Estuarine ecology Ecological systems and processes intact (e.g. benthic flora and fauna) Ecological systems and processes mostly intact (e.g. some changes to benthic flora and fauna) Ecological systems and processes modified (e.g. loss of benthic flora and fauna) Ecological systems and processes degraded (e.g. major changes to habitats or species assemblages)

Stage 2. Assessing Australia's modified estuaries

The second stage of the assessment was to determine the relative extent of change for the modified estuaries from their pre-European settlement condition; a challenging task given the limited amount of data and information available.

The assessment framework needed to be able to take into account:

A pressure-state-response framework (ANZECC 2000, Deeley & Paling 1999, Ward et al. 1998) (Table 22) was used as the basis of a more detailed condition assessment for Australia's modified estuaries. The assessment attempted to capture and quantify as much of the information as possible while considering key processes that drive the way a specific estuary functions.

Table 22: Pressure-state-response assessment framework.
State ranking Ecosystem integrity index (70%)
Water and sediment quality index (10%)
Fish health index (10%)
Habitat condition index (10%)
near-pristine largely unmodified modified extensively modified
Pressure ranking Utilisation index (50%)
Susceptibility index (50%)
low - no pressure low - medium pressure medium - high pressure high - very high pressure
Response Responses are documented in terms of institutional arrangements, management actions and community initiatives, but are not scored

Before you download

Most publications are downloadable as PDF files. Adobe Acrobat Reader  is required to view PDF files.

If you are unable to access a publication, please contact us to organise a suitable alternative format.

Key

   Links to an another web site
   Opens a pop-up window